Tennis masters. Nitto vs Next Generation ATP Finals


  • Alejandro Sánchez-Pay Department of Physical Activity and Sports, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
  • José Julián Navarro-Cuenca Departamento de Actividad Física y Deportes, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, España.
  • Bernardino J. Sánchez- Alcaraz Department of Physical Activity and Sports, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.



performance analysis, racquet sports, professional tennis, competition, statistics


The objective of this study was to know the influence of the modification of the tournament regulations between the 2019 Nitto ATP Finals and Next Gen tournaments in relation to physical and technical parameters. In order to do this, 100% of the sets played (34 of the Nitto ATP Finals and 55 of the Next Gen) of a total of 30 matches were analysed. The data was selected from the information published on the Official Website of the Tennis ATP ( The results of this study show that the specific tournament regulations in the Next Gen ATP Finals (matches to the best of 5 sets of four games, elimination of the advantages and use of the "golden point", and the no-let rule) could influence the duration of the match and the number of total break opportunities, although not significantly. The percentage of first serves was similar between both tournaments, so despite including the no-let rule, the time interruptions between the first and second serves were equivalent.


Download data is not yet available.


Barnett, T., Meyer, D., & Pollard, G. (2008). Applying match statistics to increase serving performance. Medicine and Science in Tennis, 13(2), 24–27.

Brown, E., & O’Donoghue, P. (2008). Gender and surface effect on elite tennis strategy. ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review, 46, 911.

Collinson, L., & Hughes, M. D. (2003). Surface effect on the strategy of elite female tennis players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(4), 266–267.

Cross, R., & Pollard, G. (2009). Grand slam men’s singles tennis 1991-2009 serve speeds and other related data. ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review, 16(49), 8–10.

Ferjan, R. (2001). Comparison of game characteristics of final matches at the US and Australian Opens in 2000 and 2001. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Sport. Ljubljana

Katić, R., Milat, S., Zagorac, N., & DJurović, N. (2011). Impact of game elements on tennis match outcome in Wimbledon and Roland Garros 2009. Collegium Antropologicum, 35(2), 341–346.

Mesagno, C., Geukes, K., & Larkin, P. (2015). Choking under pressure: A review of current debates, literature, and interventions. In S. D. Mellalieu y S. Hanton (Eds.), Contemporary advances in sport psychology: A review New York: Routledge.

Quereda-Sánchez, I., Courel-Ibáñez, J., Sánchez-Pay, A., Alfonso-Asencio, M., & Sánchez-Alcaraz, B.J. (2020). Diferencias en las estadísticas de competición en tenis en el Abierto de Australia 2019 en función del género y del resultado del partido. Acción Motriz, 24, 29-35.



How to Cite

Sánchez-Pay, A., Navarro-Cuenca, J. J. ., & Sánchez- Alcaraz , B. J. . (2020). Tennis masters. Nitto vs Next Generation ATP Finals. ITF Coaching & Sport Science Review, 28(82), 14–17.